Periodontal Therapy in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Periodontitis: Randomized Control Clinical Trial.

Background: Bariatric surgery (BS) patients may experience the progression of periodontitis during recovery. We aimed to determine whether non-surgical periodontal therapy before BS improves the periodontal and systemic health parameters after the surgery. Methods: BS candidates with periodontitis were randomized into the test (TG) and control group (CG). One month before BS (pre-BS), patients in the TG (n = 15) received non-surgical periodontal therapy, while patients in the CG (n = 15) received only mechanical plaque removal. Patients were re-examined 3 and 6 months after BS. Differences between the TG and CG in clinical periodontal parameters, systemic health-related serum biomarkers, parameters of obesity, and prevalence of obesity-related diseases were evaluated. Results: From the 30 included patients, 26 were re-examined at 3 months and 20 patients at 6 months. Periodontal parameters bleeding on probing (p = 0.015), periodontal pocket dept (PPD, p = 0.0015), % PPD > 4 mm (p < 0.001), and full-mouth plaque levels (p = 0.002) were lower in the TG than in the CG at 6 months after BS. There is a general improvement in systemic health after BS without significant differences (p > 0.05) between the TG and CG at the 6-month follow-up. The TG shows a tendency for improvement in metabolic syndrome components at the 6-month follow-up compared to pre-BS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Non-surgical periodontal therapy in periodontitis patients before the BS may improve periodontal health 3 and 6 months after the surgery. The possible benefits of periodontal therapy on the overall health of BS patients should be further explored.

Gingival shape analysis using surface curvature estimation of the intraoral scans.

BACKGROUND: Despite many advances in dentistry, no objective and quantitative method is available to evaluate gingival shape. The surface curvature of the optical scans represents an unexploited possibility. The present study aimed to test surface curvature estimation of intraoral scans for objective evaluation of gingival shape. METHODS: The method consists of four main steps, i.e., optical scanning, surface curvature estimation, region of interest (ROI) definition, and gingival shape analysis. Six different curvature measures and three different diameters were tested for surface curvature estimation on central (n = 78) and interdental ROI (n = 88) of patients with advanced periodontitis to quantify gingiva with a novel gingival shape parameter (GS). The reproducibility was evaluated by repeating the method on two consecutive intraoral scans obtained with a scan-rescan process of the same patient at the same time point (n = 8). RESULTS: Minimum and mean curvature measures computed at 2 mm diameter seem optimal GS to quantify shape at central and interdental ROI, respectively. The mean (and standard deviation) of the GS was 0.33 ± 0.07 and 0.19 ± 0.09 for central ROI using minimum, and interdental ROI using mean curvature measure, respectively, computed at a diameter of 2 mm. The method's reproducibility evaluated on scan-rescan models for the above-mentioned ROI and curvature measures was 0.02 and 0.01, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surface curvature estimation of the intraoral optical scans presents a precise and highly reproducible method for the objective gingival shape quantification enabling the detection of subtle changes. A careful selection of parameters for surface curvature estimation and curvature measures is required.

Periodontal and Hepatic Parameters in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

PURPOSE: Current discoveries imply a connection between periodontitis and metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of periodontitis and MAFLD in obese patients with BMI >40, employing the most reliable diagnostic methods, namely liver biopsy, and detailed periodontal examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver biopsy and periodontal examination were performed in 30 obese patients with BMI BMI >40 undergoing bariatric surgery. Kleiner's classification was used to determine non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NAS) activity score, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis. The periodontal condition was classified following the recent AAP/EFP classification. Patients were divided into periodontitis (PG) and non-periodontitis groups (NPG). Data on systemic health parameters were collected from patients' medical records. Descriptive statistics and simple statistical tests were used to determine the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of NASH in the sample was 43% (13/30), borderline NASH 37% (11/30), while fibrosis stage 1 was most common (72%, [22/30]). Periodontitis prevalence was 67% (20/30), while all non-periodontitis patients (33%; 10/30) exhibited gingivitis. PG and NPG did not differ in NAS or NASH prevalence (p > 0.05). However, the periodontitis group showed higher C-reactive protein levels, while NPG showed higher gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study results suggest the considerable prevalence of MAFLD, periodontitis and gingivitis in obese patients with BMI >40 undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients with periodontitis had higher CRP levels, while those with gingivitis presented higher gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels.

Periodontal and systemic health of morbidly obese patients eligible for bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In obese patients, periodontitis might be associated with deprived systemic health. Edmonton obesity staging system (EOSS) is a new tool for classification of obesity that considers the metabolic, physical, and psychological health. The cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the periodontal status of morbidly obese patients eligible for bariatric surgery and the association between periodontitis, obesity-related comorbidities, and EOSS. METHODS: Morbidly obese patients eligible for bariatric surgery underwent detailed periodontal examination and were divided into the periodontitis group (PG) and the non-periodontitis group (NPG). The medical and demographic data were obtained from medical files, while behavioural data were obtained by the interview. Descriptive statistics and simple statistical tests were used to summarise the characteristics of the sample and the differences between PG and NPG. The logistic regression models were used to calculate the association (odds ratio (OR)) between periodontitis and obesity-related diseases and EOSS. RESULTS: The study included 79 patients, with an average BMI of 44.6 kg/m2 (SD = 7.2). The prevalence of periodontitis was 65% (CI 95% 53%-75%). PG patients (n = 51) were older, more often smokers and were more often hypertensive than NPG patients (n = 28) (p < 0.05). Hypertension was positively associated with periodontitis with adjusted OR 3.98 (95% CI 1.23-12.8; p = 0.021)) and age with adjusted OR 1.06, (95% CI 1.01-1.13; p = 0.038)), while other tested conditions (diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and smoking habits) did not show significant association with periodontitis. Periodontitis did not correlate with EOSS or other obesity-related comorbidities (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The morbidly obese patients eligible for bariatric surgery show a high prevalence of periodontitis and, therefore, are advised to be examined by a dentist before undergoing surgery. They have higher odds of hypertension but not of other obesity-related diseases or higher stages of EOSS. The medical personnel should raise awareness among obese patients on the potential association of poor periodontal health with hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04653714.

Evaluation of gingival recessions with conventional versus digital methods.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to compare the conventional clinical and a digital method for evaluating differences in gingival recession (ΔREC) in patients with advanced periodontitis treated with the non-surgical treatment protocol. METHODS: Agreement between the methods was evaluated on a sample of ten patients with periodontitis (stage III/IV, grade B/C) with acquired clinical measurements and digital models from baseline (T0) and 12-months after non-surgical treatment of periodontitis (T1). The evaluation was performed on maxillary teeth from right to left second premolar resulting in overall 99 teeth. Clinical evaluation was performed by subtracting the distance measurements between gingival margin and cemento-enamel junction, obtained at T0 and T1 by a calibrated examiner (intra-examiner agreement >90%). The digital evaluation was performed directly by measuring the distance between the gingival margins on superimposed T0 and T1 digital models. Using Bland-Altman and statistical analysis, all six measurements sites around each included tooth (n=594) acquired with both methods were compared. RESULTS: Median ΔREC (5th and 95th percentile) acquired with a conventional clinical and digital method was 0.0mm (-2.0 - 1.0) and -0.4mm (-1.6 - 0.8), respectively (p<0.0001). The complete agreement between rounded digital and clinical ΔREC values was only 38%, revealing high disagreement also confirmed by Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -2.6 to 1.8mm. Absolute differences between the methods higher than 0.5 and 1 mm, was found in 61% and 38% of measurement sites, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional clinical method for ΔREC evaluation exhibits lower sensitivity and accuracy than the digital method. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The quality of both clinical and research data in periodontology and implantology can be considerably improved by the digital method while still preserving the compatibility with the conventional clinical method.

Peri-implant soft tissue contour after stepwise replacement of missing and ankylotic central maxillary incisors in young adult: A clinical case report.

Replantation and retention of ankylosed tooth after pubertal growth spurt enables stepwise replacement of both central incisors with implants. Partial extraction contributes to natural gingival contour.